The Future of Hangar Valuations: Nine Structural Forces

Abstract

The aircraft hangar market is moving from a niche governed by practitioner intuition to an asset class that institutional capital, federal regulators, and the courts expect to be valued with evidence. This paper identifies nine structural forces driving that transition and traces the valuation consequence of each: fleet modernization and the growth in aircraft size, institutional capital discovery, quantification of ground lease term risk, PFAS contamination and environmental stigma, electric aircraft and advanced air mobility, operational consolidation among airports, smart-hangar technology, sustainability mandates, and regulatory evolution. Each force is documented from primary sources, including manufacturer specifications, Securities and Exchange Commission filings, Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Aviation Administration rulemaking, Government Accountability Office audits, and the manufacturers' delivery record. The paper then describes the valuation practice these forces demand, an empirical foundation, shared data infrastructure, and aviation-specific competency standards, and projects the market's development through 2035. It closes with implications for appraisers, investors, airport sponsors, and lenders.

1. Introduction

The United States has 5,179 public-use landing facilities, 3,287 of which are in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems, and the FAA identifies $67.5 billion of eligible development at those airports over 2025 through 2029 (Federal Aviation Administration 2024a). Hangars are the private capital layer on top of that public system. At the roughly $300 to $340 per rentable square foot implied by current institutional development (Sky Harbour Group 2026a), a modest 40,000-square-foot facility is a $12 million to $14 million asset. Yet the only published practitioner methodology for valuing such an asset is a two-part series from 2008 (Lindsey 2008a, 2008b), and practitioners continue to apply lease-term adjustments of 25 to 300 basis points to hangar capitalization rates without an empirical basis for choosing a point in that range (Carter 2026a).

That gap is closing, and not only through academic effort. Institutional investors now file audited financial statements on hangar portfolios. Federal agencies have designated the chemicals in legacy firefighting foam as hazardous substances. Aircraft manufacturers are delivering airplanes that do not fit the hangars built for their predecessors. Electric aircraft have begun government-sponsored integration flights. Each of these developments is a structural force acting on hangar value, and each demands a valuation response that generic commercial method cannot supply.

This paper identifies nine such forces, documents each from primary sources, and describes the valuation practice they are producing. The central thesis is that these forces are converging to transform an opaque, relationship-driven market into one that demands, and will increasingly receive, rigorous, data-driven valuation. Practitioners who adapt early will capture the opportunity; those who do not will find their work product increasingly difficult to defend. Companion papers in this series treat several of the forces at greater length (Carter 2026a, 2026b, 2026c, 2026d, 2026e, 2026f).

2. The Current State: An Asset Class Without Empirical Foundation

To understand where hangar valuation is headed, one must appreciate where it stands. Lindsey's foundational work established a conceptual framework covering hangar classification, property rights, and the three approaches to value adapted for aviation, and explicitly did not attempt to quantify the relationships that practitioners need most (Lindsey 2008a, 2008b). It predated institutional hangar investment and the environmental, technological, and regulatory developments that now dominate the asset class. The closest subsequent guidance comes from the Airport Cooperative Research Program, whose report on market value and market rent at small airports and whose legal digest on general aviation lease development document sponsor practice without supplying the empirical parameters an appraiser needs (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2020; Karaskiewicz 2024).

The result is a market characterized by information asymmetry. Airport sponsors focus on operations, investors on returns, and operators on serving aircraft, and each holds evidence the others lack. An investor who understands ground lease valuation can acquire assets at discounts to intrinsic value; an investor who applies industrial real estate metrics to aviation assets overpays or misses opportunities in plain sight (Carter 2026g). This vacuum is not sustainable. As institutional capital flows into aviation real estate and regulatory complexity intensifies, the demand for defensible, empirically grounded valuation will only accelerate.

3. Nine Structural Forces Reshaping Hangar Valuations

3.1 Fleet modernization and size inflation

The business aviation industry's sustained shift toward larger, longer-range aircraft is creating measurable functional obsolescence across the legacy hangar inventory. A Cessna Citation CJ4, a light jet, stands 15 feet 5 inches tall with a 51-foot 9-inch wingspan (Textron Aviation 2026). A Gulfstream G500 stands 25 feet 6 inches with an 86-foot 4-inch wingspan; a G700 stands 25 feet 5 inches with a 103-foot wingspan (Gulfstream Aerospace 2026a, 2026b). A Bombardier Global 7500 stands 27 feet with a 104-foot wingspan (Bombardier 2026). The Dassault Falcon 10X, which made its first flight in June 2026 and is now planned for service entry in 2029, will stand 27.6 feet with a 110-foot wingspan (Dassault Aviation 2026a, 2026b; Aviation International News 2026). A hangar with a door clearance that adequately served Citations in 2005 cannot house any of these aircraft.

The fleet data confirm the direction. Sky Harbour reports that the cumulative square footage of the United States business aircraft fleet grew 73 percent between 2010 and 2025, and that the square footage of jets with tail heights above 24 feet grew 120 percent over the same period (Sky Harbour Group 2026a). In 2025 the three large-cabin manufacturers, Gulfstream, Bombardier, and Dassault, delivered 352 of the 854 business jets shipped worldwide but accounted for about $20 billion of the industry's $31.0 billion in airplane billings (General Aviation Manufacturers Association 2026). Fire protection standards are following the fleet: the 2026 edition of NFPA 409 raised the door-height threshold that separates hangar groups to 35 feet (National Air Transportation Association 2026).

The valuation implication is direct. Appraisers must assess whether an existing facility can accommodate the replacement aircraft its current tenants are likely to acquire, and must treat an incurable dimensional limitation as a permanent restriction on the addressable market rather than as a footnote (Carter 2026c). Facilities that cannot house current-generation mid-cabin and larger aircraft will carry a functional obsolescence discount that grows as the fleet turns over, and its magnitude is a question of market evidence at each airport.

3.2 Institutional capital discovery

Private equity, infrastructure funds, family offices, and a publicly traded developer have discovered aviation real estate as an investable asset class. Sky Harbour Group, the sector's first public pure play, reported 60 hangars in operation across eight campuses at mid-2026, with 1,042,340 rentable square feet at 83.7 percent occupancy, ground leases at 19 airports, and a development pipeline of 71 hangars and 2.6 million square feet (Sky Harbour Group 2026b). The fixed-base operator channel that controls much of the hangar stock at larger airports has been consolidated by Blackstone, Global Infrastructure Partners, and Cascade at Signature Aviation, by KKR at Atlantic Aviation, and most recently by Bain Capital Real Estate at APP Jet Center (Blackstone 2021; Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation 2021; Bain Capital 2026). Real estate operators have built hangar-specific platforms, among them SomeraRoad's SR Aviation Infrastructure (SomeraRoad 2024).

Institutionalization carries valuation consequences. It introduces capital markets discipline to a market previously dominated by owner-operators and local investors. It creates demand for valuation that satisfies institutional reporting: the 2020 Global Investment Performance Standards require real estate held in pooled vehicles to receive an external valuation at least once every 12 months, performed by an independent, professionally designated valuer (CFA Institute 2019, provisions 2.A.43 through 2.A.45), and appraisal practice must satisfy USPAP (The Appraisal Foundation 2024). And it generates transaction and lease data that, while still thin relative to mainstream property, is beginning to support empirical analysis of pricing drivers.

Institutional investors are also discovering that generic commercial real estate frameworks produce materially misleading results when applied to aviation assets. Airport regulation, ground lease structure, and the aviation demand cycle create investment dynamics that industrial property does not share (Carter 2026g), and the recognition is driving demand for specialized valuation expertise.

3.3 Ground lease term risk quantification

The relationship between remaining ground lease term and capitalization rate is the central unresolved question in hangar valuation. Most hangar assets sit on ground leases from public sponsors with finite terms and reversion clauses that transfer the improvements to the sponsor at expiration without compensation (Karaskiewicz 2024; Carter 2026b). The appraiser must apply a lease-term adjustment to the capitalization rate, and the magnitude of that adjustment is currently drawn from professional judgment across a range of 25 to 300 basis points (Lindsey 2008a, 2008b).

The author's theoretical work argues that the lease-term discount in aviation exceeds that observed in conventional commercial ground leases because three amplifying features converge: reversion without compensation, the single-purpose nature of the building, and the sponsor's position as the sole lessor on the field (Carter 2026a). The framework predicts a non-linear discount curve with an inflection where lender term-matching rules bind, and a companion empirical paper is in progress to calibrate it. Table 1 sets out the working framework that practice currently uses while that calibration proceeds.

Source: Author's working framework, drawn from the theoretical model in Carter (2026a) and the lender analysis in Carter (2026f).

Once a validated discount curve exists, it will replace ad hoc judgment with data-driven adjustments that improve consistency and defensibility. Lenders will calibrate underwriting to empirical thresholds rather than institutional rules of thumb. Sponsors will negotiate lease terms with a quantitative understanding of how duration affects tenant investment. The capital allocation process will become more efficient.

3.4 PFAS contamination and environmental stigma

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from the aqueous film-forming foam historically required for aircraft rescue and firefighting are becoming the defining environmental problem in aviation real estate valuation. The regulatory record is now extensive. On April 10, 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency issued the first national drinking water standard for six PFAS compounds, with maximum contaminant levels of 4.0 parts per trillion for PFOA and PFOS (Environmental Protection Agency 2024a). Nine days later it designated PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under the federal Superfund statute, effective July 8, 2024, exposing owners and operators of contaminated sites to strict, joint, and several liability for response costs (Environmental Protection Agency 2024b). In 2025 the agency announced that it would retain both the hazardous substance designations and the PFOA and PFOS drinking water limits while proposing to rescind the limits for four other compounds and to extend the compliance deadline to 2031; the proposals were published in May 2026 and remained pending as of September 2026 (Environmental Protection Agency 2025a, 2025b, 2026).

The financial exposure is documented. The Department of Defense spent $2.6 billion on PFAS response between fiscal 2017 and 2023 and estimates more than $9.3 billion in further investigation and cleanup costs, much of it tied to airfield firefighting (U.S. Government Accountability Office 2025). The Environmental Working Group's contamination map lists 9,728 sites with detected PFAS across all fifty states, with airports and military airfields well represented (Environmental Working Group 2026). On the civilian side, the FAA has accepted fluorine-free foam at certificated airports since the Navy published a performance specification in January 2023, and qualified products became available that September, but as of the agency's August 2026 guidance airports are permitted rather than required to transition, and many still carry legacy foam (Federal Aviation Administration 2023a, 2023b, 2026b). The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 created a reimbursement program for foam replacement and equipment cleaning (Holland and Knight 2024).

The valuation literature offers a starting point but not an answer. Mundy (1992) established stigma as a distinct component of value loss. Jackson's studies of industrial property found discounts of roughly 28 to 30 percent for contaminated properties sold before or during remediation and no statistically significant discount after cleanup (Jackson 2001, 2002). PFAS differs in two respects that bear directly on stigma: remediation technology is less mature, and the regulatory limits remain in motion, which raises the prospect of reopened obligations after an initial cleanup. No peer-reviewed study yet quantifies the effect of PFAS discovery on hangar values (Carter 2026d). Going forward, Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments will move from recommended to standard in hangar transactions, and empirically validated stigma models for airport property will become a frontier of valuation research.

3.5 Electric aircraft and advanced air mobility

Electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft are approaching operation. The FAA's final rule integrating powered-lift aircraft, Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 120, was announced in October 2024 and took effect in January 2025 (Federal Aviation Administration 2024b). Joby Aviation has held a Part 135 air carrier certificate since 2022, flew its first FAA-conforming aircraft in March 2026 in the final phase of type certification, and began flights under the federal eVTOL Integration Pilot Program in Texas in September 2026 (Joby Aviation 2022, 2026; AeroTime 2026). Archer Aviation has held a Part 135 certificate since 2024 and reported closing the third of four type certification phases in 2026 (Archer Aviation 2026). The Department of Transportation selected eight state and local sponsors for the integration pilot program in March 2026 (Federal Aviation Administration 2026c). No eVTOL had received a type certificate as of September 2026, and the FAA's vertiport design guidance remains an engineering brief pending a full advisory circular (Federal Aviation Administration 2024c).

Electric aircraft require high-capacity electrical service, charging infrastructure, and fire protection arrangements that legacy hangars built for turbine aircraft do not have. This creates a dual valuation problem: legacy facilities may face devaluation as electric operations arrive, while purpose-built or retrofitted facilities may command emerging premiums as first movers. Airports investing in electrical capacity and vertiport infrastructure are positioning themselves as nodes in advanced air mobility networks, and hangars at those airports may develop location premiums that do not yet appear in transaction data. Forward-looking appraisers will need to incorporate advanced air mobility readiness into location analysis and functional utility assessment as the operating record accumulates.

3.6 Operational consolidation and the hub-and-spoke model

Corporate flight departments are consolidating operations at fewer, full-service airports with instrument approaches, deicing, charter services, customs facilities, and modern terminals, basing their primary aircraft at operationally superior home fields and using fixed-base operators elsewhere for transient operations. The consolidation produces winners and losers among hangar markets. Preferred airports experience persistent demand, multi-year waiting lists, and upward rent pressure, while secondary fields lacking full services experience based-aircraft attrition and structural vacancy that cyclical recovery alone will not resolve. Waiting lists at general aviation airports commonly run two to five years (Kariuki 2023), and in constrained markets operators report no developable land at all (Epstein 2023).

The valuation implication is that the dispersion of hangar values between premier and secondary locations will widen. The airport characteristics that drive that dispersion, runway length and instrument capability, fuel and service infrastructure, proximity to demand, and sponsor leasing posture, are treated in a companion paper (Carter 2026e). Appraisers who fail to assess operational capability rigorously will produce value conclusions that are unreliable in both directions.

3.7 Smart hangar technology and data-driven operations

Corporate flight departments and managed charter operators increasingly expect technology-forward facilities. Environmental monitoring, automated door control, advanced security, high-speed connectivity, distributed antenna systems for in-hangar cellular coverage, and digital tenant portals are moving from differentiators to baseline expectations at premium facilities. Remote management reduces operating labor while improving tenant retention.

From a valuation perspective, technology integration creates a new dimension of functional adequacy. Facilities lacking these capabilities will face a competitive disadvantage in tenant attraction and retention, producing lower achievable rents and higher vacancy risk that the income approach must reflect. Technology obsolescence is likely to emerge as a recognized category of functional depreciation alongside the physical and dimensional categories treated in Carter (2026c), with its magnitude established from rent evidence.

3.8 Sustainability mandates and ESG integration

Corporate sustainability commitments are introducing valuation factors that did not exist a decade ago. Sustainable aviation fuel availability is becoming a factor for flight departments choosing where to base aircraft. The National Business Aviation Association describes SAF supply at fixed-base operators as growing but still constrained by price and volume, and one major supplier reports SAF available at more than 55 locations across North America, Europe, and the United Kingdom (National Business Aviation Association 2026; Business Aviation Coalition for Sustainable Aviation Fuel 2026). Airports with confirmed SAF supply can market that capability, and it is reasonable to expect a modest rental effect at the margin once lease evidence can be assembled.

Building performance is a second channel. The evidence on certified buildings is mixed. A federal post-occupancy study of 22 government buildings found certified buildings used 25 percent less energy and cost 19 percent less to operate than the national average (U.S. General Services Administration 2011); a peer-reviewed study of 4,417 office buildings found site energy savings of about 11 percent and source energy savings of about 7 percent for certified offices (Scofield et al. 2021); and a study of retrofitted federal buildings found no statistically significant savings on average (Clay, Severnini, and Sun 2023). Appraisers should treat energy and sustainability features as matters for operating expense evidence at the subject rather than for a standard premium.

3.9 Regulatory evolution and through-the-fence uncertainty

The regulatory environment around hangars continues to evolve. Through-the-fence access, by which aircraft on adjacent private land reach a public airport's runways, is governed by statute since Congress added a residential through-the-fence provision in the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, and by the FAA's 2013 policy and 2021 compliance guidance, which permit existing residential access under conditions but bar new residential through-the-fence agreements at federally obligated airports (U.S. Congress 2012; Federal Aviation Administration 2013, 2021). Existing operations with grandfathered status may carry scarcity premiums, but their long-term regulatory footing is a matter of the sponsor's ongoing compliance.

The FAA's 2016 policy restricts non-aeronautical use of hangars on obligated airports (Federal Aviation Administration 2016). The agency's grant assurances were modified in April 2025 (Federal Aviation Administration 2025), its Airport Compliance Manual was reissued as Order 5190.6C in February 2026, replacing the 2009 manual and its changes (Federal Aviation Administration 2026a), and a draft revision of the Airport Improvement Program Handbook, Order 5100.38E, was published for comment in 2026 (Federal Aviation Administration 2026d). Each development creates incremental cost, risk, and complexity that must be incorporated into appraisal analysis rather than addressed through disclaimer language. The future of hangar valuation requires practitioners to convert regulatory uncertainty into measurable adjustments to discount rates, capitalization rates, and cash flow projections.

4. The Emerging Valuation Paradigm: From Art to Science

4.1 Empirical foundation

The practice of the future rests on empirical foundations that do not yet exist but are under construction. The author's research program, conducted through a university faculty appointment and through Valuation Takes Flight, targets the gaps identified above: the lease-term and capitalization rate relationship (Carter 2026a), reversion mechanics and lender behavior (Carter 2026b, 2026f), depreciation of aviation improvements (Carter 2026c), environmental stigma at airports (Carter 2026d), and the airport characteristics that drive hangar value (Carter 2026e). As these foundations are established and published, they will give practitioners data-driven tools that replace the ad hoc judgment currently governing the field. The transition will not happen overnight, but the direction is clear.

4.2 Data infrastructure

The chronic shortage of reliable transaction data is beginning to ease as institutional participants bring data discipline to the sector. Public sources are richer than most appraisers realize. The FAA's Airport Data and Information Portal, which replaced the Form 5010 Airport Master Record in 2024, carries facility, runway, and based-aircraft data for every public-use airport, and the agency's 28-day National Airspace System Resources subscription provides the same data in bulk (Federal Aviation Administration 2024d, 2026e). County deed records, state aircraft registration files, and sponsor lease files complete the picture. Systematically compiled, these sources support empirical research without proprietary databases.

The development of a centralized hangar transaction and lease database, whether maintained by an industry association, a commercial data provider, or an academic program, would change practice. It would permit the extraction of market-derived capitalization rates, the construction of reliable adjustment grids, and the validation of regression models that account for airport, property, and lease characteristics simultaneously.

4.3 Specialized appraisal standards

The growing complexity and institutional significance of hangar valuation will drive demand for specialized competency. USPAP supplies the general framework, and its Competency Rule already requires an appraiser who lacks the knowledge an assignment demands to acquire it or decline (The Appraisal Foundation 2024). What USPAP does not supply is aviation-specific guidance on ground lease reversion, regulatory overlay, contamination from mandated materials, or the interaction between the aviation cycle and property value. Supplemental guidance, whether from the Appraisal Institute or a specialized industry body, is the likely next step: minimum competency for aviation real estate assignments, recommended procedures for ground lease analysis, environmental protocols tailored to airport property, and reporting standards compatible with institutional performance measurement under GIPS (CFA Institute 2019).

5. Projected Market Evolution, 2026 to 2035

Table 2 sets out the author's projection of how the nine forces will play out over the coming decade.

Source: Author's projection, drawing on the regulatory and certification timelines cited in Section 3.

6. Implications for Market Participants

6.1 For appraisers

Aviation specialization will be rewarded, and generic commercial method applied to hangar assets will become increasingly difficult to defend. Practitioners should invest in aviation market knowledge, follow the emerging empirical literature, and develop competencies in ground lease analysis, environmental risk quantification, and fleet compatibility assessment. Those who build these capabilities early will find strong demand and limited competition.

6.2 For investors

The information asymmetry that creates acquisition opportunity today will diminish as the market professionalizes. The window for generating excess return through superior market knowledge is real but finite. Investors should build or acquire aviation-specific valuation capability, ensure environmental due diligence is thorough rather than perfunctory, evaluate assets for fleet compatibility and technology readiness rather than current occupancy alone, and model lease-term risk explicitly rather than by rule of thumb (Carter 2026g). The strongest risk-adjusted returns will go to investors who combine capital markets discipline with aviation expertise, a combination that remains rare.

6.3 For airport sponsors

Sponsors negotiating ground leases should anticipate that empirical research on lease-term pricing will give tenants and investors quantitative evidence for their positions. Sponsors that offer longer terms with reasonable renewal options will attract more private investment and better facilities, and the quantification of lease-term risk will make the cost of short or uncertain terms transparent. Proactive sponsors will also invest in electrical capacity, environmental remediation, and fuel infrastructure to strengthen the competitive position of their airports and the value of the hangars on them.

6.4 For lenders

Lenders should prepare for a transition from qualitative to quantitative assessment of aviation-specific risk. Empirical lease-term discount curves will inform underwriting thresholds. Environmental risk scoring will become a standard component of credit analysis. Fleet compatibility will factor into collateral assessment. Lenders that develop internal expertise, or partner with specialists who have it, will underwrite the asset class accurately and capture lending opportunities that less-informed competitors decline (Carter 2026f).

7. Conclusion

Hangar valuation is transitioning from professional intuition to empirical rigor. The transition is driven not by academic interest alone but by the practical demands of institutional capital, regulatory complexity, technological change, and environmental liability that have outgrown the capacity of existing method.

The nine forces identified here, fleet modernization, institutional capital discovery, ground lease term quantification, PFAS contamination, electric aircraft and advanced air mobility, operational consolidation, smart technology, sustainability mandates, and regulatory evolution, are not independent. They interact and amplify one another. An airport with PFAS contamination that also faces fleet modernization pressure and short remaining lease terms presents a valuation problem that no single capitalization rate adjustment can resolve. The future belongs to integrated analytical frameworks that model those interactions explicitly.

The author's research program and practice are dedicated to building the empirical foundations and practical tools this transformation demands. The opportunity is significant, the need is urgent, and the trajectory is clear. Hangar valuation is becoming a profession, not only a practice.

References

AeroTime. 2026. "Joby Aviation Begins Its First eIPP Flights in Texas." AeroTime, September 11. https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/joby-aviation-first-eipp-evtol-integration-pilot-program-flights

Archer Aviation. 2026. "Archer Announces First Quarter 2026 Results, Highlighting Record FAA Certification Progress With Initial US Operations Expected in 2026." Archer Aviation, May 11. https://investors.archer.com/news/news-details/2026/

Aviation International News. 2026. "Dassault Falcon 10X Bizjet Service Entry Slips from 2027 to 2029." AIN, July 23. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2026-07-23/dassault-falcon-10x-entry-service-slips-2029

Bain Capital. 2026. "Bain Capital Enters Fixed-Base Operator Sector With Acquisition of APP Jet Center." Business Wire, January 27. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260127920915/en/

Blackstone. 2021. "Blackstone, Cascade and Global Infrastructure Partners Announce Terms of a Recommended Offer for Signature Aviation plc." Blackstone, February 5. https://www.blackstone.com/news/press/blackstone-cascade-and-global-infrastructure-partners-announce-terms-of-a-recommended-offer-for-signature-aviation-plc/

Bombardier. 2026. "Global 7500: Specifications." Bombardier Inc. https://bombardier.com/en/aircraft/global-7500

Business Aviation Coalition for Sustainable Aviation Fuel. 2026. "Find SAF." Future of Sustainable Fuel. https://www.futureofsustainablefuel.com/find-saf/

Carter, C.W. 2026a. "Grounded Assets and Appropriable Rents: Hold-Up Risk in Hangar Ground Leases." Aeronautical Valuation Research Series, Valuation Takes Flight LLC. https://valuationtakesflight.com/research/grounded-assets-and-appropriable-rents.html

Carter, C.W. 2026b. "Ground-Lease Reversion Risk: Why a Hangar Can Be Worth Less Than It Cost to Build." Aeronautical Valuation Research Series, Valuation Takes Flight LLC. https://valuationtakesflight.com/research/ground-lease-reversion-risk.html

Carter, C.W. 2026c. "Depreciation of Aircraft Hangars: Physical, Functional, and External." Aeronautical Valuation Research Series, Valuation Takes Flight LLC. https://valuationtakesflight.com/research/depreciation-of-aircraft-hangars.html

Carter, C.W. 2026d. "PFAS and AFFF: How Firefighting Foam Contamination Affects Hangar Value." Aeronautical Valuation Research Series, Valuation Takes Flight LLC. https://valuationtakesflight.com/research/pfas-afff-hangar-valuation.html

Carter, C.W. 2026e. "Cleared for Value: How Airport Characteristics Drive Hangar Value." Aeronautical Valuation Research Series, Valuation Takes Flight LLC. https://valuationtakesflight.com/research/airport-characteristics-and-hangar-value.html

Carter, C.W. 2026f. "Underwriting a Loan Against a Leasehold Hangar." Aeronautical Valuation Research Series, Valuation Takes Flight LLC. https://valuationtakesflight.com/research/underwriting-leasehold-hangar-loan.html

Carter, C.W. 2026g. "Are Hangars a Good Investment? An ROI Framework for Institutional Allocators." Aeronautical Valuation Research Series, Valuation Takes Flight LLC. https://valuationtakesflight.com/research/are-hangars-a-good-investment.html

CFA Institute. 2019. Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) for Firms, 2020 ed. Charlottesville, VA: CFA Institute. https://www.gipsstandards.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2020_gips_standards_firms.pdf

Clay, K., E.R. Severnini, and X. Sun. 2023. "Does LEED Certification Save Energy? Evidence from Retrofitted Federal Buildings." NBER Working Paper 28612. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w28612/w28612.pdf

Dassault Aviation. 2026a. "Falcon 10X." Dassault Aviation. https://www.dassaultfalcon.com/businessjets/falcon-10x/

Dassault Aviation. 2026b. "Dassault's Falcon 10X Makes Maiden Flight." Dassault Aviation, June. https://www.dassaultfalcon.com/news/dassaults-falcon-10x-makes-maiden-flight/

Environmental Protection Agency. 2024a. "PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation; Final Rule." 89 Federal Register 32532, April 26. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/04/26/2024-07773/pfas-national-primary-drinking-water-regulation

Environmental Protection Agency. 2024b. "Designation of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS) as CERCLA Hazardous Substances; Final Rule." 89 Federal Register 39124, May 8. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/05/08/2024-08547/

Environmental Protection Agency. 2025a. "EPA Announces It Will Keep Maximum Contaminant Levels for PFOA, PFOS." EPA News Release, May 14. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-announces-it-will-keep-maximum-contaminant-levels-pfoa-pfos

Environmental Protection Agency. 2025b. "EPA Announces Next Steps on Regulatory PFOA and PFOS Cleanup Efforts, Provides Update on Liability and Passive Receiver Issues." EPA News Release, September 17. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/trump-epa-announces-next-steps-regulatory-pfoa-and-pfos-cleanup-efforts-provides

Environmental Protection Agency. 2026. "Rescission of Regulatory Determinations and Removal of Related Provisions for Four PFAS Substances; Proposed Rule." 91 Federal Register 29413, May 20. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/05/20/2026-10085/

Environmental Working Group. 2026. "PFAS Contamination Crisis: New Data Show 9,728 Sites in 50 States." Interactive map, March 5. https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_contamination/map/

Epstein, Curt. 2023. "As the Private Aircraft Fleet Grows, Hangar Availability Dwindles." Aviation International News, March 1. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/business-aviation/2023-03-01/private-aircraft-fleet-grows-hangar-availability-dwindles

Federal Aviation Administration. 2013. "Airport Improvement Program (AIP): Policy Regarding Access to Airports From Residential Property." 78 Federal Register 42419, July 16. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/07/16/2013-16917/

Federal Aviation Administration. 2016. "Policy on the Non-Aeronautical Use of Airport Hangars." 81 Federal Register 38906, June 15. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/06/15/2016-14133/policy-on-the-non-aeronautical-use-of-airport-hangars

Federal Aviation Administration. 2021. "Residential Through-the-Fence Access," including Compliance Guidance Letter 2021-03. FAA Office of Airports. https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_compliance/residential_through_the_fence

Federal Aviation Administration. 2023a. Part 139 CertAlert 23-01: New Military Specification for Performance-Based Standards for Fluorine-Free Aircraft Fire Fighting Foam. FAA, January 12. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/part-139-cert-alert-23-01-F3.pdf

Federal Aviation Administration. 2023b. Part 139 CertAlert 23-07: Availability of Fluorine Free Foam (F3) on the Navy's Qualified Products List. FAA, September 13. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/part_139_cert_alert_23_07_F3_Release.pdf

Federal Aviation Administration. 2024a. National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) 2025-2029: Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, September 30. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/airports/planning_capacity/npias/current/ARP-NPIAS-2025-2029-Narrative.pdf

Federal Aviation Administration. 2024b. "Integration of Powered-Lift: Pilot Certification and Operations; Miscellaneous Amendments Related to Rotorcraft and Airplanes; Final Rule." 89 Federal Register 92296, November 21. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-11-21/html/2024-24886.htm

Federal Aviation Administration. 2024c. Engineering Brief No. 105A, Vertiport Design. FAA, December 27. https://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/engineering_briefs/eb_105a_vertiports

Federal Aviation Administration. 2024d. "Form FAA 5010-1, Airport Master Record (Cancelled; Functionality Replaced by ADIP)." FAA, July 25. https://www.faa.gov/forms/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/185474

Federal Aviation Administration. 2025. Assurances: Airport Sponsors, April 2025. Washington, DC: FAA. https://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/grant_assurances/assurances-airport-sponsors-2025

Federal Aviation Administration. 2026a. Order 5190.6C, FAA Airport Compliance Manual. Washington, DC: FAA, February 20. https://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/publications/orders/compliance_5190_6

Federal Aviation Administration. 2026b. Part 139 CertAlert 26-03: Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) and Synthetic Fluorine Free Foam (F3) Testing at Certificated Part 139 Airports. FAA, August 5. https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/certalerts/part_139_certalert_26_03

Federal Aviation Administration. 2026c. "The Future of Aviation Is Here: Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy and FAA Unveil Eight Selections for Pilot Program Testing Next-Gen Aircraft." FAA Newsroom, March 9. https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/future-aviation-here-trumps-transportation-secretary-sean-p-duffy-and-faa-unveil-eight

Federal Aviation Administration. 2026d. "Notice of Draft FAA Order 5100.38E, Airport Improvement Program Handbook." 91 Federal Register 29247, May 19. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/05/19/2026-09971/

Federal Aviation Administration. 2026e. "Airport Data and Information Portal (ADIP)" and "28 Day NASR Subscription." FAA. https://adip.faa.gov/; https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/aero_data/NASR_Subscription/

General Aviation Manufacturers Association. 2026. "2025 General Aviation Aircraft Shipment Report, Year-End." GAMA, February 18. https://gama.aero/wp-content/uploads/2025ShipmentReport_02-18-2026.pdf

Gulfstream Aerospace. 2026a. "Gulfstream G500: Specifications." Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation. https://www.gulfstream.com/en/aircraft/gulfstream-g500/

Gulfstream Aerospace. 2026b. "Gulfstream G700: Specifications." Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation. https://www.gulfstream.com/en/aircraft/gulfstream-g700/

Holland and Knight. 2024. "FAA Reauthorization Act Creates PFAS Replacement Program for Airports." Holland and Knight Insights, June. https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2024/06/faa-reauthorization-act-creates-pfas-replacement-program-for-airports

Jackson, T.O. 2001. "The Effects of Environmental Contamination on Real Estate: A Literature Review." Journal of Real Estate Literature 9(2): 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2001.12090100

Jackson, T.O. 2002. "Environmental Contamination and Industrial Real Estate Prices." Journal of Real Estate Research 23(1/2): 179-199.

Joby Aviation. 2022. "Joby Receives Part 135 Certificate From the FAA." Joby Aviation, May 26. https://www.jobyaviation.com/news/joby-receives-part-135-certificate-from-the-faa

Joby Aviation. 2026. "Joby's First FAA-Conforming Aircraft Takes Flight." Joby Aviation, March. https://www.jobyaviation.com/news/joby-s-first-faa-conforming-aircraft-takes-flight

Karaskiewicz, T.R. 2024. Legal Considerations for General Aviation Lease Development at Airports. ACRP Legal Research Digest 46. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/27990

Kariuki, Jeremy. 2023. "Hangar Headache: The Waitlist for Space Is Growing." Aviation Week Network, December 8. https://aviationweek.com/business-aviation/airports-fbos-suppliers/hangar-headache-waitlist-space-growing

Lindsey, T.J. 2008a. "An Introduction to the Valuation of Aircraft Hangars." The Appraisal Journal 76(1): 26-38.

Lindsey, T.J. 2008b. "An Introduction to the Valuation of Aircraft Hangars, Part 2." The Appraisal Journal 76(2).

Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation. 2021. "Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation Announces Agreement to Sell Atlantic Aviation to KKR for $4.475 Billion." Business Wire, June 7. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210607005386/en/

Mundy, B. 1992. "Stigma and Value." The Appraisal Journal 60(1): 7-13.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Estimating Market Value and Establishing Market Rent at Small Airports. ACRP Research Report 213. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25719

National Air Transportation Association. 2026. "NFPA 409 (2026) Introduces Key NATA-Supported Updates to Aircraft Hangar Standards." NATA, February 10. https://nata.aero/nfpa-409-2026-introduces-key-nata-supported-updates-to-aircraft-hangar-standards/

National Business Aviation Association. 2026. "Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)." NBAA. https://nbaa.org/aircraft-operations/environmental-sustainability/sustainable-aviation-fuel-saf/

Scofield, J.H., S. Brodnitz, J. Cornell, T. Liang, and T. Scofield. 2021. "Energy and Greenhouse Gas Savings for LEED-Certified U.S. Office Buildings." Energies 14(3): 749. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/3/749

Sky Harbour Group Corporation. 2026a. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, March 19. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1823587/000143774926009045/ysac20251231_10k.htm

Sky Harbour Group Corporation. 2026b. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2026. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, August 12. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1823587/000143774926027302/ysac20260630_10q.htm

SomeraRoad. 2024. "SomeraRoad Acquires Quail Air Center Las Vegas, Launching Aviation Infrastructure Platform, SR Aviation Infrastructure." PR Newswire, November 19. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/someraroad-acquires-quail-air-center-las-vegas-302309322.html

Textron Aviation. 2026. "Cessna Citation CJ4 Gen3: Specifications." Textron Aviation. https://cessna.txtav.com/en/citation/cj4

The Appraisal Foundation. 2024. Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, 2024 ed. Washington, DC: The Appraisal Foundation. https://appraisalfoundation.org/pages/uspap

U.S. Congress. 2012. FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95, Section 136. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-112publ95/html/PLAW-112publ95.htm

U.S. General Services Administration. 2011. Green Building Performance: A Post Occupancy Evaluation of 22 GSA Buildings. Washington, DC: GSA Public Buildings Service, August. https://www.gsa.gov/system/files/Green_Building_Performance2.pdf

U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2025. Persistent Chemicals: DOD Needs to Provide Congress More Information on Costs Associated with Addressing PFAS. GAO-25-107401, February. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107401

This paper is research and general information for professionals evaluating aviation real estate. It is not appraisal, legal, or tax advice, and it does not create an engagement.